On at least 2 artisan websites I've noted derogatory references to the use of animal fats in soap as well as the use of triple milling.
From my standpoint animal fats are just fine as a source of raw triglycerides necessary for soap. Furthermore the use of fats makes some sense as it uses a natural byproduct of 'animal husbandry and butchering.' I'm fine with folks who don't like the use of animals for anything and/or animal cruelty ... but my personal opinion is that there is no scientific or other technical reason that makes animal fat = bad.
As far as triple milling, I was under the impression (after reading a very old book about soap manufacture) that the purposes of milling were 1) to make a more uniform product, 2) to make a product with less water that was more long-lasting, and 3) to facilitate the inclusion of scents (since milling is essentially a 'cold process').
Can anyone shed more scientific or technical light on these issues? I'm wondering what I'm missing.
Warm Regards-
Dave
From my standpoint animal fats are just fine as a source of raw triglycerides necessary for soap. Furthermore the use of fats makes some sense as it uses a natural byproduct of 'animal husbandry and butchering.' I'm fine with folks who don't like the use of animals for anything and/or animal cruelty ... but my personal opinion is that there is no scientific or other technical reason that makes animal fat = bad.
As far as triple milling, I was under the impression (after reading a very old book about soap manufacture) that the purposes of milling were 1) to make a more uniform product, 2) to make a product with less water that was more long-lasting, and 3) to facilitate the inclusion of scents (since milling is essentially a 'cold process').
Can anyone shed more scientific or technical light on these issues? I'm wondering what I'm missing.
Warm Regards-
Dave