DeeAnna said:
Irish Lass - I would truly like to hear your DH's opinions, if and when.
I'll keep you posted!
DeeAnna said:
You (Irish Lass) wrote in one of your posts that you had been pretty satisfied with a recipe that scored 28 bubbly and 52 creamy -- it didn't need a huge amount of water to lather up, but protected your hubby's skin well. My recollection of your explanation was when your recipe was higher in the creamy score, it was harder to lather without extra work and time.
Yes- correct. My first ever shaving formula contained only 4% of a bubbly oil, namely coconut- and it was 27 on the bubbly and 57 on the creamy. Here's my combined fatty acid profile for that particular formula:
Lauric: 3
Linoleic: 4
Linolenic: 0
Myristic: 3
Oleic: 31
Palmitic: 15
Stearic: 20
Ricinoleic: 22
and the "quality" numbers:
Harness: 41
Cleansing: 6
Conditioning: 57
Bubbly: 27
Creamy: 57
Iodine: 56
INS: 132
Hubby loved it because 1) it had great glide and cushion /didn't give him any nicks or cuts, and 2) it didn't dry his face out or make it feel tight after shaving.
Although he didn't give me any complaints about it, I decided to see if I could improve upon it based on the feedback I was recieving from a very kind and gracious shaving afficianado who had contacted me privately through the forum. He (the gracious afficiando) had been doing a web-search on shaving soaps made with tallow and had come across some of my posts regarding shaving soap here on the forum. Anyway, to make a long story short, he agreed to be a tester for my shave soap, and through his very honest and detailed feedback (I told him to hold nothing back), I decided to increase my bubbly oils, hopefully without undermining any of the glide/cushion/protection, all of which he agreed with my hubby were superb and should never be changed.
I must say that it was really wonderful to recieve such intricately detailed feedback from a shaving afficianado. Although my sweet hubby shaves every day, he's more of a 'shave to live' kinda guy rather than one who 'lives to shave', if you know what I mean. His shaving philosophy is such that if the soap eventually lathers within about 2 minutes of applying friction and doesn't cause nicks and cuts or dry his skin out, it's all good and everything else is gravy. It doesn't take much to please him. lol
In the end, my formula went from containing 4% bubbly oils to 10% bubbly oils, with minor tweaks here and there to my other fats, as well as an increase in my superfat level to compensate. When all was said and done, my shaving afficianado/tester gave my new, improved formula a score of 10+ in every catagory across the board, with the only criticism being that he felt I could still go even a little bit higher on the ease of lather factor- but only if it didn't mess with any of the soap's other qualities, which he thought were so outstanding that his "first day sharp blade jitters" were greatly reduced if it was my soap with which he was using to break in the new blade. He told me if I ever decided to sell, and if I marketed my shave soap at a competitive price, he wouldn't hesitate to buy my soap, even 'as is' (i.e., without any further tweaking done to it) and would openly endorse it. Needless to say, such high praise from someone so serious about his shaving toilette had me floating on huge, fluffy clouds of joy! Hubby's feedback, although just as honest, wasn't quite as detailed to put it mildly, but he did tell me that it lathered easier.... and that the improvement was still just gravy, or icing on the cake to him. lol
Anyway, all of the above happened about 3 years ago, and I never did tweak my formula any further than what I did since I had no desire to sell or market my soap then (and still don't at present), and also because hubby was/is quite happy with it, but reading Songwind's thread the other day has lit a fire under the experimentor in me, and I just want to see if the ease-of-lather factor improves at all by subbing in a little KOH for the NaOH (hopefully without messing up the other qualities that my hubby loves). I'll let you know how it goes.
Oh- here are the soap qualities for the improved formula with the 10% bubbly oils: First here is my fatty acid profile:
Lauric: 6
Linoleic: 4
Linolenic: 0
Myristic: 4
Oleic: 29
Palmitic: 16
Stearic: 21
Ricinoleic: 18
and the 'quality' numbers:
Hardness: 46
Cleansing: 10
Conditioning: 51
Bubbly: 28
Creamy: 54
Iodine: 52
INS: 143
As you can see- the cleansing went up and the conditioning went down in comparison to my previous formula, hence my decision to increase the superfat to 8% on this one (up from the 5% S/F on the previous formula).
DeeAnna said:
On a related topic, I am not sure I am interpreting a point correctly about stearic acid in shave soaps....
Lindy has written that one needs at least 40% stearic acid content for a good shave soap. I don't doubt her advice works for her. You have written that you have a good recipe for shave soap that is about 20% stearic acid or thereabouts. I don't doubt your advice is working for you. You two have gently agreed to disagree on the matter, but I'm still puzzling on this and it seems like such an important point to be clear about....
If I look at the analysis of commercially-sold stearic acid, I see the product is not actually 100% stearic acid as one would think. It actually is more like about 50% stearic and 50% palmitic. So if I wanted to prepare a shave soap that is truly 40% stearic acid, as pure stearic acid, the recipe would have to be almost all commercial stearic to get the actual stearic analysis up to 40%. Trying to meet a 40% actual stearic content disqualifies all of the fats traditionally used in shave soaps, including tallow (23% stearic). Even Songwind's recipe, which calls for a whopping 52% commercial stearic, has only 29% actual stearic acid, and it gets decent reviews by the straight-razor crowd.
Now that I realize how much commercial stearic would be required to make a soap with 40% actual stearic, I wonder if the difference between you and Lindy is more one of interpretation. Could it be that Lindy talking about the amount of commercial "stearic", and you are talking about the amount of actual stearic? You are both thoughtful, competent soapers, and it is unusual there is such an apparent divergence of opinion on this point.
Ahhh.....I had no idea that commercial stearic was actually a mix of 50% stearic and 50% palmitic. I don't use any stand-alone, commercial stearic acid in my shave soap at all, so that may indeed be the reason why Lindy and I have such a divergence in opinion, or at least part of the reason why. Thank you for pointing that out.
The entire 21% stearic content in my formula is purely derived from just the fats and oils that that I use. For what it's worth, I use tallow, kokum butter, illipe butter, hydrogenated PKO flakes, coconut oil, castor oil, olive oil, avocado oil, and rice bran oil (not necesarilly in that order, of course). I also use 10% vegetable glycerin ppo, as well as coconut milk, kaolin clay, and sodium lactate.
The other part of the reason for our divergence of opinion, I strongly suspect, could very likely stem from the differing feedback that we each have recieved from those who have used, or continue to use our soap. Granted, I'm quite sure a whole lot more men have used Lindy's soap in comparison to the scant few that have used mine (seeing as how she sells and I don't), but that does not necesarilly make the feedback that either one of us has recieved any more or less valid, important, or useful than each other's. Instead (to me), it's just another living example of how everyone's skin is different and that one size doesn't necesarilly fit all. A lot depends on individual preferences.
I'm not sure what type of shave soap Lindy makes, but for what it's worth, I make the hard puck-type via the CP method (as opposed to HP), and if there's anyone out there wondering if 20% - 21% total stearic is enough for a hard, puck-type shave soap made via CP- one that lathers up with shaving can-type lather- I want to tell you to be encouraged, because I'm living proof that it is, and I know of others who can say the same thing (some of whom even sell). The best advice I can give anyone is to get some testers who'll give you honest feedback, then just keep experimenting and adjusting things according to the feedback they give you. Oh- and have fun and don't give up!
IrishLass