ok_shaving_soap said:Just because the cup said "Caution : contents hot, handle with care" or some other type of blanket statement does not prevent liability in cases where you are intentionally putting your customers at danger for your own good (more revenue).
It would be like if a soaper were to slap a warning on their packaging saying "Caution : may contain pockets of un-reacted lye" and trying to sell a customer a bar of pure lye... the little warning doesn't really count when you know you are making it dangerous.
You've brought up the point that many of us having been trying to emphasize - a blanket statement doesn't prevent liability!!!
It doesn't matter if someone experiences or believes to experience a reaction to something she or he purchased from you. You can be sued and you can lose! As someone mentioned earlier in this discussion, insurance is a no brainer.
BTW, I don't like being attacked about using the McD's coffee incident as an example. I never said the woman was stupid, sue-happy or wanted to get rich. I'd like to correct the opinion of some people who think I'm being callous about this woman who was burned by McD's coffee. At the time this happened, I was employed by a management group and I would drive over 500 miles every week. I often stopped at McD's and bought coffee. I know it was hot, hot, hot because several times I had spilt it on myself and it was painful. But I never thought to sue the company. It only takes one person to sue you and you could lose everything! I will never suggest to anyone to start any business without protecting herself by having insurance. That's a risk people have to decide on their own that they're willing to take.
edited to correct misspelled word