Deanna, I have a question...

Soapmaking Forum

Help Support Soapmaking Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Engblom: "...Could this [not very bubbly lather] be because of the soda formed?..."

I'm not sure I can answer this. I am not seeing obvious soda ash ON this first soap (this is the one in which the emulsion broke and cleaned my oven). Not to say there couldn't be soda ash IN the surface layer of the soap. This soap is more porous, the weeping/draining/evaporating water is carrying lye out of the soap, and the soap is quickly becoming non-zappy. So, yes, it wouldn't surprise me that there's an odd layer of ash or whatever within the surface layer of the soap.

From AnnaMarie's post 159, it seems there is ~something~ on the surface of the bars that's different:

"...When it first got wet it was initially slimy with a thin jelly layer, but that went away quickly and voila- the lovely lather I remember...."
"...I'm wondering if the initial slime was glycerin?..."

Slime sounds like glycerin attracting water to itself, yes. So far I have not felt the slime, just low lather, but my soap is still a baby. I'm thinking Engblom may be right about the soda ash being a factor. I'll keep messing with samples as the soap cures to see if the inside of the soap lathers better than the outside. That would tell me if glycerin or soda ash is a factor.

****

StarDancer: "...DeeAnna, do you think mine would have gone through the same emulsification process as everyone else's if my lye was off? My lye isn't clumpy the way it's supposed to get when liquid gets in, but some of it has been clinging to the neck of the bottle. ..."

I'm not quite sure what's going on with your soap. It's puzzling to me too. I don't know enough about this type of soap to say if your lye was off. My guess is it's probably fine, however. I just wonder if adding color and milk may have changed things enough to alter how the soap cures. Just don't know -- sorry!

I can venture a good guess about the color not morphing from pink to purple. That most likely has to do with the unusually dilute NaOH solution in the finished batter. Although there is a large total amount of lye left in the batter, that lye is not very concentrated.

Here's an analogy: You're in a big football stadium with 1000s of fans. In the bleachers, people are crowded together. Out on the field, the players have lots of room. But there's still 50,000 people in the stadium. Your chances of bumping up against another person is pretty high in the bleacher area and pretty small out on the field. Translate that to a pink color molecule looking for an NaOH molecule so she can morph from pink into purple. The molecule's chances of finding an NaOH partner are much better with concentrated lye.

****

AnnaMarie: "...My soap was concave in the middle with big holes filled with lye water. The only thing I did different this time was to pour thinner bars...."

Could be the pressure of the thicker soap is needed to keep the soap pressed together at the bottom of the mold?

Your pics remind me of a made-from-scratch souffle or angel food cake failure -- again a relatively light foamy material that is rather delicate.

I think we're learning more about soap in general rather than just about this recipe, because I know others have posted pics of "normal" soap with this kind of cracking too. Interesting!!!

****

Okay, here's what I THINK I'm seeing as key factors to this recipe:

A big lye excess (negative superfat) is important. A lye excess of about -20% (Engblom #117, DeeAnna #103) may not work well. A lye excess of about -40% (AnnaMarie #1 and others) does work. You can use SoapCalc to design a recipe like this with negative superfat (DeeAnna#124).

A big water excess is also important. An NaOH solution concentration of about 25% may not work well (Engblom #117). This is roughly 80% total water as a % of total oil. It appears that an NaOH solution concentration of 15% to 20% does work -- this is roughly 100% to 130% total water as a % of total oil (AnnaMarie #1 and others).

If you use the method in the original recipe where all of the water is added to the batter, be aware that finished "trace" will happen very, very quickly. The batter will change from "thick gravy" to a plastic-y and shiny-slick "pudding". If you aren't at a weird plastic-y pudding texture, keep stirring because you aren't at trace yet! (AnnaMarie #88-#95, Seven #104).

3/10/2014 update: The above paragraph is true if you use a stick blender a lot. With mostly or all hand stirring, this plastic-y look at trace may not happen -- your batter may look similar to a normal soap batter at trace. I think the consensus is to use a SB at first, if at all, to get things mixed well, then hand stir with no or very light SB use thereafter.

Handle this soap and any liquid that may drain from the soap with caution. Until proved otherwise, assume the soap contains active lye and may burn skin and eyes. Gloves and goggles recommended!

****

The soap batter emulsion is fragile and will "break" if the molded soap gets too warm. Some of my thoughts and observations:

I'm getting the feeling that the batter needs to be well under 100 deg F (38 C) when poured into the mold. (Seven #112, etc.)

It's my thinking that I don't want this soap to gel, so I would only insulate lightly if at all. But, AnnaMarie, please chime in about this, cuz I do think you gel this soap, so maybe I'm not correct here.

Definitely do not CPOP this recipe. (Newbie #59, DeeAnna #52)

If your mold will leak (like my wood molds do) be sure to set the mold in a non-aluminum pan to catch any drips. Let the batter weep/drain as needed if the emulsion breaks. Resist the urge to CPOP or rebatch!

See also AnnaMarie's soap cracks (#128 ) -- the type of mold may affect the appearance of the soap.

****
 
A big lye excess (negative superfat) is important. A lye excess of about -20% (Engblom #117, DeeAnna #103) may not work well. A lye excess of about -40% (AnnaMarie #1 and others) does work. You can use SoapCalc to design a recipe like this with negative superfat (DeeAnna#124).

Mine was not a Castile either... I tried to adopt this style of recipe to "Aleppo soap". Mine was 70% olive oil and 30% Laurel Berry oil. Thus my result might differ a lot from those following the original recipe.
 
that is interesting observation DeeAnna... i was wondering how this soap should be once in the mold. as the recipe in spanish journeys said nothing about this. i mean, does the emulsion is supposed to break (which resulted in water in the mold) OR does it supposed to stay intact with no water weeping?
 
Soap #2 update. This is the one with the blend of 30:70 lard:high oleic safflower that approximates the fatty acid profile of olive.

I didn't insulate the wood mold; just left it on the kitchen counter overnight. I did put a wire mesh cooling rack on top to keep curious cats from getting into trouble. This morning, no obvious separation, no weeping, no draining. The top is still quite zappy. The center of the log is 81 deg F (27 C) in a 65 F (18 C) house, so there is still saponification going on. I'm going to leave the mold alone today and do some more checking this evening.

I saved a couple of samples -- #1 of the batter at thick trace before adding the extra water and #2 of the batter as it went into the mold. Sample #1 is still a thick but pourable pudding -- about like it was last night. Sample #2 has set up, but is still rather soft and tender. Not sure what this is telling me, but I'll see what happens to the samples as the day goes on.

Seven: "...does the emulsion is supposed to break (which resulted in water in the mold) OR does it supposed to stay intact with no water weeping?..."

From what I'm reading from the spanishjourneys and the ehow articles, I think either can and does happen, depending on the environmental conditions. Given that we're finding the emulsion to be so fragile, I now understand why people are seeing these wide variations.

From ehow: "...Pour the creamy soap mixture into your soap moulds or loaf pans, and set aside for at least 48 hours. Check the soap after 12 hours, and if separation has occurred, stir the liquid on top back into the soap mixture. Turn out the finished soap after it has fully solidified. This will usually take about three days. Slice the soap into bars, and wrap in parchment paper to dry and cure for another two weeks before using...."

The reason why I didn't insulate or cover the mold for my second batch is that I was thinking of the lady in the spanishjourneys picture who was stirring the soap batter. I wondered how she might treat the finished soap, and I guessed she would have done about the same as my grandmother -- meaning not much. When my grandmother made lard and lye soap, she just covered her molded soap with a section of the Des Moines Register newspaper to keep the flies and dust off. The soap got set back in the "milk room", basically an enclosed porch, to finish saponifying. After a day or so, she cut the soap into big chunks (it was only used for laundry, not people) and set the chunks back in the same peach crate to dry.

"...Since we are testing lather I brought out one of my month old bars to try out. No zaps, burns, stings- it felt quite mild. When it first got wet it was initially slimy with a thin jelly layer, but that went away quickly and voila- the lovely lather I remember. I will look forward to seeing the pics of your modified recipe DeeAnna...."

AnnaMarie -- Thanks for the pic and description of the lather! That is encouraging to know the lather has improved. I'm looking forward to seeing the lather from my soaps change as time goes on. I'll get some pics tonight of my soap tonight, when I have a better idea of how it's turning out (or not!)
 
Soap report on one month old soap (I'd better check my records on that as it might be more), but anyway.....I did an interesting experiment this morning and stuck a bar in water and left it there for two hours. The bar never got soft or gooey, but a clear jelly layer formed on surface. I'm really starting to think it's glycerine. I'm posting a picture of it. The lather on this soap once it gets going is great.

I'm really beginning to wonder if super fatting really is the best route for soap.

image.jpg
 
AnnaMarie -- as in you're thinking less SF might be better? I have to say this recipe challenges the idea that positive superfat is absolutely always required.

Your soak test is intriguing. I think I need to try this with my soaps too, not only this recipe but also my normal soaps.

I remember a couple of articles a few years old on the Soap Queen blog where she was a soap judge. One of the tests the judges did was to soak small chunks of the soaps in small cups of water. The % of water soaked up was one criteria. Soap that soaked up less water = better score. She said that many of the soaps that didn't do so well in this test also didn't do well in other areas of the judging, so the soak test was a pretty strong indicator of overall quality. Of course, blogs being blogs, I can't find the article now, but that's the gist as best I can remember it.

Update on my 2nd recipe: I just took it out of the mold -- I was so curious to see the entire loaf! Some areas on the sides and bottom have a film of very zappy liquid, but there's no weeping, draining, discoloration, weird cracks, or liquid-filled pockets. The surfaces that are definitely dry have little to no zap. The soap is decently firm and a nice pale ivory color. I'll let the loaf dry this afternoon and maybe cut it tonight if it looks like it can stand being cut.

I'm getting really good at dealing with the masochistic aspect of positive zap tests. I'm not sure that's a Good Thing, but there ya go. :shifty:
 
Last edited:
Okay, thank goodness for Google -- here's the blog entry I was thinking about: http://www.soapqueen.com/business/goatsmilk-soap-judging-2/

And here's the quote I was trying to remember:

"...It is amazing how badly we rated some of the bars for lather and residue. Those same bars scored poorly on the water absorption test as well, absorbing much more than the suggested 5-15% rate. The fact that, scientifically from a water-absorption rate, these bars were poor coincided impressively with our subjective ratings on lather, residue and feeling when using...."
 
To answer your question in all seriousness, yes, I am doubting that super fatting is always the best. Why? Well, I scraped off some of this jelly on the soap and it tasted almost sweet which is why I am thinking it's glycerine. I understand glycerine to be very good for your skin, and his soap loves to make it. The soap never gets gooey, but when wet you get a layer of jelly. I could be entirely was off base here- I'm no scientist. Just taking an educated guess. :)
Cheers!
Anna Marie
Ps- the hand stirred soap is getting thicker.
 
i wonder what time you'll finished. if it turns out that it's the same time as using a SB, or even lesser, then we all learn something new again about this soap.
 
Me and my pioneer mama ideas :crazy::crazy:

Holy moly! This soap looks a LOT different when hand stirred and is passing the trace test after 45 min of off and on hand stirring. I don't trust pouring yet though and am going to keep stirring.

Lab report time!
Okay people, I am not only standing by the original recipe, but I am standing by the hand stirring over stick blending. This recipe was not made for a stick blender. I hand stirred off and on for about an hour (I did not stir constantly). Trace showed up somewhere around 45 min, but I just couldn't believe it. At an hour it was unmistakable. The whole process looked MUCH different. No separation of anything- it just gradually got smoother and thicker. Before I poured I decided to get out this stick blender and thicken it up. Five min of SB and the batter looked more shiny, glossy, and pudding-like. To test though I did pour a sample bar before the SB and then I have the rest of the batter in the mold (full to the top) plus a couple of small molds. Towels are underneath the soap as usual to catch any lye water. I am very curious to see how this turns out. This is a soap you could make while watching tv :)
Cheers!
Anna Marie
pictures will follow

Soap when it traced

Soap when given 5 min with the SB

image.jpg


image.jpg
 
Hmm. Now I'm really curious about your soap recipes and stuff. I mostly HP, and most of my CP soaps gel. Like I mentioned, the one CP castile I didn't gel took a while to firm up and longer before cutting.... but not quite that long...

[thread=42707]You have a thread open about this already though,[/thread] right? I'm gonna bump it back up to the top for ya so we can all do more brainstorming. :)

Thanks! :) Yeah, I'm new enough that I can't figure out what's happening on my own. lol

I'm not quite sure what's going on with your soap. It's puzzling to me too. I don't know enough about this type of soap to say if your lye was off. My guess is it's probably fine, however. I just wonder if adding color and milk may have changed things enough to alter how the soap cures. Just don't know -- sorry!

I can venture a good guess about the color not morphing from pink to purple. That most likely has to do with the unusually dilute NaOH solution in the finished batter. Although there is a large total amount of lye left in the batter, that lye is not very concentrated.

Here's an analogy: You're in a big football stadium with 1000s of fans. In the bleachers, people are crowded together. Out on the field, the players have lots of room. But there's still 50,000 people in the stadium. Your chances of bumping up against another person is pretty high in the bleacher area and pretty small out on the field. Translate that to a pink color molecule looking for an NaOH molecule so she can morph from pink into purple. The molecule's chances of finding an NaOH partner are much better with concentrated lye.

Hmm, so you're thinking that the color morphing is based on reactions with the NaOH? Rather than simply having an alkaline environment?

And I think having the milk and honey there is interesting, even if it's crazy-making for me. lol Might need as long to cure as a 'normal' castile!
 
Okay, thank goodness for Google -- here's the blog entry I was thinking about: http://www.soapqueen.com/business/goatsmilk-soap-judging-2/

And here's the quote I was trying to remember:

"...It is amazing how badly we rated some of the bars for lather and residue. Those same bars scored poorly on the water absorption test as well, absorbing much more than the suggested 5-15% rate. The fact that, scientifically from a water-absorption rate, these bars were poor coincided impressively with our subjective ratings on lather, residue and feeling when using...."

Well, I just took two perfectly good bars of soap to soak them and see how they fare!
 
Wow this looks like fun! I wanna try this too!
You know how some people suggest (in the old timey way) that you add a little bit of soap to your batter to help it along? What if you added a little bit of melted already made and mostly olive oil soap?
eyes her husbands precious pile of bastile soaps speculatively
Really AnnaMarie? Hand stirring for over an hour in the same direction with a wooden spoon?
 
Wow this looks like fun! I wanna try this too!
You know how some people suggest (in the old timey way) that you add a little bit of soap to your batter to help it along? What if you added a little bit of melted already made and mostly olive oil soap?
eyes her husbands precious pile of bastile soaps speculatively
Really AnnaMarie? Hand stirring for over an hour in the same direction with a wooden spoon?

Lol! Yes, hand stirred- in the same direction with a wooden spoon, but with lots of breaks. It really wasn't bad at all. As far as the recipe- I'm not tempted to mess with it- I love it as is! :). You should try it SeaWolfe!

Cheers!
Anna Marie
 
oh my. i'm willing to bet all the soap i have on my curing racks that this new batch AM just did by hand stirring is gonna behave differently in the mold, no water pool, no nothing. i think the gentle hand stirring is the key to the perfect emulsification this soap needs.

no wonder the recipe mentioned nothing about SB. but at least the writer should've mentioned that the hand stirring is gonna take at least an hour. when i read that post, i honestly thought it's gonna take at least 5 hours or something.
 
"...Hmm, so you're thinking that the color morphing is based on reactions with the NaOH? Rather than simply having an alkaline environment?..."

Stardancer: Alkalinity is just a measurement of the hydroxide ion concentration. NaOH dissociates (splits apart) into sodium ions (Na+) and hydroxide ions (OH-). If the NaOH concentration is lower than usual in this recipe, that also means the OH- concentration -- aka the alkalinity -- is correspondingly lower. If the alkalinity is low enough, the color might not shift.
 
Last edited:
Lol! Yes, hand stirred- in the same direction with a wooden spoon, but with lots of breaks. It really wasn't bad at all. As far as the recipe- I'm not tempted to mess with it- I love it as is! :).

That was my thinking right from the beginning. "If it ain't broke don't try and fix it" and that there must have been a reason for the recipe and instructions to be as they were. I have always had great respect for the old ways. Recipes such as that have probably been passed down from generation to generation and I am sure they have had their fair share of trials and errors and "test batches" along the way before ending up with the recipe as it stands. Good on you for giving "tradition" the benefit of the doubt. ;)
 
I can see your point about the hand stirring, AnnaMarie. If I hadn't done it myself, I would never have believed a whole liter of water would meekly blend into the soap batter with just hand stirring. But it did. I'm still surprised by that, but it worked.

edit: I'm all for learning and using traditional methods too, but I also want to know the "whys" behind the tradition. I want to know, not only for my own learning and enjoyment, but also because I want to better understand the people who learned how to do things in ways that eventually became codified as tradition.

This recipe was originally created by someone who was determined and stubborn enough to figure it out. When she was done figuring out the process and the recipe, I bet she could explain in detail the precise reasons why the recipe needs to be done the way it's done. Maybe her granddaughters and great-granddaughters viewed the recipe as a tradition, but I bet their elders viewed the recipe as practical knowledge learned by hard work and experimentation.

I truly enjoy the work this group has been doing to shed light on what works and what doesn't. I view our trials, successes, and failures as honoring the original people who worked hard to create this recipe and soapmaking method.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top