An Important Read

Soapmaking Forum

Help Support Soapmaking Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Lindy

Soap Diva Queen
Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2008
Messages
8,625
Reaction score
1,685
Location
BC
This was posted on FaceBook by Nature's Gift Aromatherapy and I feel it is important enough that it needs to be shared.

ADVERSE REACTIONS - DANGEROUS METHODS: PLEASE SHARE!

Last night I received an email from a stranger, telling a story that gave me chills, and asking questions. Chelsea M. has given me permission to share our dialogue. PLEASE share this with any friends who are overusing these powerful oils, by blanket neat usage and internal use.

Marge,

I know this is a rather long e-mail, but I hope you will read all of it and reply to it, because I respect you and trust you to give me honest answers.

I've read some of the recent posts on your blog dealing with essential oil safety, and I want to thank you for your commitment to safety.

I have been purchasing essential oils primarily from a network marketing company for some time now. As you know, they teach rather liberal use of their oils. I was hesitant to be so liberal with the oils (something in the back of my mind kept bugging me about herbs sometimes being harmful, so why would essential oils be different?), but as I talked with more people in the company, I became less and less cautious in my use. They would say things like, "If people are having bad reactions, why isn't the company being sued all the time?" Also, I had reacted badly to lavender-scented things before (lotions, soaps, deodorant), but I did not react to their lavender oil, so I thought something must be different. Plus, it was just easier to not have to dilute the essential oils.

At the same time, I had some great experiences with using them. A chronic upper-respiratory infection was knocked out once and for all by using them internally. My sister used some internally and her longtime food allergies disappeared. It was things like this that made me feel that these oils really were safe to use as the people in the company had said.

However, the more I used the oils, the more I started to notice an internal itching that just wouldn't go away. Literally, the itching was inside me. And then, I started to get tiny, itchy, blistery bumps on the outside of my fingers and hands. The final straw was when I took some oils internally and my intestines became so inflamed that they swelled, and I looked like I had suddenly gained a lot of weight in my midsection. I had to take anti-inflammatory medication to bring the swelling down.

During all of this, people in the company would say things like, "Oh, it's just your body releasing toxins" or "you need to use THESE oils first to help clean out your [insert organ of the body here (liver, kidneys, intestines, etc.)]."

Chelsea..this is totally horrifying! "your body is detoxing"... that is criminal... criminal ignorance, perhaps..but still criminal.

I did my own research, however, and I have come to the conclusion that I have been using the oils in an unsafe manner. I look back now and cringe when I think that I used oils undiluted on my BABY!

yes... you have. And people like me (and the majority of RESPONSIBLE practitioners and vendors have been trying to say that for years...and being ignored or attacked.)

I do have some questions still though that I hope you can answer for me. One of the big selling points of the company I referred to was that they do extensive testing on their oils. I was told that they test every batch and that they use the "longest" form of whatever tests they do. I guess GC/MS testing has shorter and longer versions? Also, they hire independent third parties to both perform the testing and interpret the test results. Anyway, I was told that the majority of companies only do GC testing, or only test batches every once in a while and trust the supplier for the rest of the time, or accept testing results from the supplier (which is like "the fox guarding the henhouse"), or don't have an experienced, properly qualified person interpreting testing results. It's not so much that they say their oils are more pure than anyone else's; other companies MAY have oils that are just as pure, but you just don't know for sure because no one does the extensive testing that they do. Now, since I know that such testing has to be quite expensive, I was willing to pay more for the peace of mind. Now that I know how to use the oils properly, I have still been purchasing from them for this reason. Please help dispel all this so I won't have any more reasons to support a company that doesn't teach proper essential oil safety.

okay... for example.. GC/MS testing can have different levels of accuracy...but that is more dependent upon the person reading the test results, the adequacy of the 'library' of results that they are comparing this read out to, etc.

There are ALSO people who can deliberately 'doctor' test results to make them say what the client wants them to say. Just as there are chemists fully capable of adding whatever to a pure natural oil to extend it. I have known chemists who have, at some point in their carriers, done that.

I am not a chemist, and Nature's Gift is FAR too small to have an onstaff chemist. When we test, the testing is done by one of three independent labs.

(discussion and links to those who test for us deleted for brevity.)


NOW... do I test every batch of every oil? NO. (Discussion of the costs of testing deleted for brevity.)

Why do I not test every batch? because I KNOW my suppliers. They take as much pride in their product as I do in Nature's Gift. I COULD test every batch they ship me. The fact that the test might well cost me more than the value of the oil is a factor. (I do NOT buy in the giant quantities of an MLM supplier!)

If I have bought from the same distiller every year for over a decade, should I add the extra cost to each year's batch of oil?

When I am dealing with a new supplier I will test. I will occasionally spot test an existing supplier to keep them honest. There are people that I have known in this industry since before Nature's Gift was online.. they have mentored me, they continue to mentor me. They share their wonderful oils with me. They give me THEIR test results.

I trust them.

at SOME point, Chelsea, you have to be able to trust the people you are dealing with.

now... regarding which ever MLM you have been dealing with and been injured by.

You talk of their testing and retesting. Do they allow you to see the results of their tests? I doubt it. (At one time a friend was doing a research study. she had been required to use the oils supplied by a specific MLM. She had the opportunity to be published. She needed the GC/MS analysis. She was told it was not available "because it was proprietary information." excuse me?) I might say it's not available because I don't HAVE it... but if I have it, and a client has a legitimate need of it, I'll send it on. Many of ours are posted online for people to see.

Another factor. You continue to use this company's oils because you trust their quality.

ooooooooooooookay.

These people are deliberately teaching dangerous over use of their product. (the downlinks may well be innocent dupes...the people at the top of the chain most definitely know what they are doing.) Why? Because if I tell you to DILUTE my oils to a low dilution you won't use nearly as much and I won't SELL as much. Neat and/or internal use = much larger profits.

They are placing their financial welfare ahead of those who 'buy' their sales pitch. This gives you reason to TRUST them, trust the quality of their products?

In TOTAL and complete honesty, the ONLY way to know that what you are buying is exactly what the vendor says it is is to have THAT bottle tested. for YOU to have it tested. otherwise, you are dependant upon what I say, whatever the supplier you choose to buy from says. The MLM you deal with doesn't share their test results. How do you KNOW that this oil was tested? And, better yet, how do you know that the test results are what you would want them to be? You trust them. You believe what they tell you.

I want to tell you that I am more worthy of your trust than the people you currently buy from. But this is a choice you have to make for yourself.

NOW... I think this whole conversation is important... ESPECIALLY what you wrote me... the history/your experience.

I would like to post this as a blog article... not sharing your real name, but quoting your message...and my response...accurately.

I can't quote you without your permission. Please allow me to. People HAVE to have access to experiences like yours!!!

Her response to my request:

Marge,

Thank you so much for your quick response! Yes, you may quote me. I have to try to undo the harm I may have already caused to others I've shared oils with. Luckily, they are few in number. I can only imagine the potential harm if I had chosen to build a business and sold oils to hundreds or even thousands of people. I shudder to think of it.

Oh, and you're right: it does come down to trust. And, I don't see any more reasons why I should trust the MLM company. I guess I just figured that if they did make their testing results public, I wouldn't understand them anyway, so it didn't matter. And, since the people at the head of the company seemed to genuinely care about people, I wanted to believe that they weren't purposely teaching misuse of the oils, but they would HAVE to know what they're doing. Maybe they've deceived themselves...

Anyway, I am not going to be purchasing from this company anymore. Expect an order from me soon!

Chelsea
 
Yes, Lindy thank you for the information. Frightening to think that people would so misrepresent their products for monetary gain, but I am sure it happens more often than we would like to think.
 
Thank you for sharing, I see why it gave you chills.
 
Horrifyingly scary! The regular public doesn't know not to trust these people, especially when these reps tell people they're "certified" and have gone through "classes" & "training". Not too mention the fact that they have a "doctor" that started the company. I've heard a lot of those reps tell people that you can't be allergic to their EO's, because they're Therapeutic Grade & if you have a reaction, it's because your body's "releasing toxins". Apparently they use that phrase a lot. They are a dangerous group of snake oil salesmen.


If I may also add, here's a reason to never believe people when they say it's okay to put EO's in or around your eyes:
http://roberttisserand.com/2013/02/essential-oils-and-eye-safety/
 
It really is terrifying and it's why I am such a fanatic on here about trying to get people to understand what they are using when they are using essential oils for fragrancing. I know I drive some of you mad with it, but really there is a reason.

Genny I saw that! That is another good example of misinformation being bandied about and doing harm. I was really glad Robert shared that one.
 
I cant find this on their facebook page. Could you tell us what date this was posted there?
 
Thank you Lindy, I did visit the page but missed it. Thank you for letting me know which day to look for.

I find it interesting that this does not mention the company that is promoting the use of dangerous levels of these oils. That would be rather important information.

Does anyone know who they are referring to?
 
It's one of the essential oils MLM groups. If you were to go look at these sites you will see recommendations like this being made. Very scary stuff and can I say - only in North America can they get away with it? Europe has far more stringent legislation handling companies like this..... There you are actually restricted in how much you can use in your soaps and leave-on products determined by the EO itself. Some are restricted to as low as 0.5%!!!
 
Right, just like a lot of other things, there are safe levels and unsafe levels.

Thats why im wondering. If they are promoting unsafe use why no one is naming them?

Do you know which company is doing this?
 
Right, just like a lot of other things, there are safe levels and unsafe levels.

Thats why im wondering. If they are promoting unsafe use why no one is naming them?

Do you know which company is doing this?

It's most likely Young Living. They are notorious for things like this, but I'm not sure that's who the people in the email were talking about, since they didn't state who it was.
 
Back
Top