Oh, Mockingbird, I think people have been reacting to "perfect" in your original question. I did, anyways. My apologies for misunderstanding.
When I look at "the numbers" in a preliminary recipe, the cleansing and conditioning values are my main interests. When I create a typical bath bar recipe, I like to see roughly 12% or so for cleansing (the sum of the % of lauric and myristic fatty acids). This keeps the solubility of my soap reasonably low, adds to the bar hardness, lathers well in cool/cold water, and creates a pleasant amount of fluffy bubbles.
For the same "typical" recipe, I like to see conditioning in the upper 50s or lower 60s (the sum of the % of oleic, ricinoleic, and linoleic fatty acids). This creates a longer lasting soap with a nice skin feel and abundant lather especially in warm water.
I don't get too fried about the other numbers. My "creamy" lather number seems to end up about twice the "fluffy" lather number, for what it's worth. The hardness number for most of my typical bath soap recipes is usually in the lower end of the "recommended" range, but all that means is that the soap might be a tad softer in the mold than someone else's. Even so, my soaps are always hard enough to unmold without problems, and they harden up well during their cure, so it's really not something I worry too much about.
I also check the INS out of curiosity -- is it close to the "recommended" range or not? -- so I have a clue if the recipe will trace fast or slow.
I hope this answers your question!