"...if we could up the bubbles, hardness, and cleansing some i think we have a winner! ..."
I'm gonna rain on your parade ... gently I hope ... but rain nonetheless.
If the Soapcalc "numbers" for hardness, etc. are driving your comment (above), please don't get too hung up on tweaking them to be "perfect" based on your current level of understanding. As others already know, I'm all for understanding and explaining the chemistry behind the "numbers", but I'm not an advocate for obsessing about them. And I really take issue with the names given to the "numbers" (hardness, bubbly, etc.). They are NOT helpful at all and mislead people greatly.
Honestly, Obsidian has done you a huge favor in coming up with this recipe. In particular, if you want a soap that will be especially nice for use in winter, leave the cleansing value alone. It's fine at 11%. Really it is. This recipe will make a gentle, pleasant soap with a good amount of bubble-age. It should also saponify easily for you, which is a good idea for a first recipe.
I'm gonna rain on your parade ... gently I hope ... but rain nonetheless.
If the Soapcalc "numbers" for hardness, etc. are driving your comment (above), please don't get too hung up on tweaking them to be "perfect" based on your current level of understanding. As others already know, I'm all for understanding and explaining the chemistry behind the "numbers", but I'm not an advocate for obsessing about them. And I really take issue with the names given to the "numbers" (hardness, bubbly, etc.). They are NOT helpful at all and mislead people greatly.
Honestly, Obsidian has done you a huge favor in coming up with this recipe. In particular, if you want a soap that will be especially nice for use in winter, leave the cleansing value alone. It's fine at 11%. Really it is. This recipe will make a gentle, pleasant soap with a good amount of bubble-age. It should also saponify easily for you, which is a good idea for a first recipe.