I have seen this question posed on other forums, one of the common responses from experienced soapers is that soap is a wash off product, as opposed to say a lotion. Most of the benefits of a luxury oil will head down the drain. Just thought I would share this with you all, what do you folks think?
Yes, soap is a wash-off product.
But if that were the end of the story, all of us could and and probably would keep using mass-produced, inexpensive, store-bought soap, which wouldn't cause us to suffer from itchy skin, dermatitis, FO-migraines, etc.
And if soap has no other effects except cleaning, we wouldn't experience the positive results from handcrafted soap, either. Mine include: no scent-induced migraines, no more peeling patches on my body, no more itchy dermatitis, and (my husband) greatly reduced eczema and psoriasis. My unscented lard-GM-colloidal oat soap is the only one I've
ever - in my life - been able to use on my face without either breakouts or severe and instant skin peeling.
So to those who say "soap is just a wash-off product," my response is "yes, but it is still a balance" - and that balance depends on a lot on the individual using the soap. Everyone has to find what works for them.
If 100% expensive vegan luxury butters and oils with a high SF works best for your skin, and you (and your plumbing) can afford it, then make it and enjoy it.
If it's tallow+lard+GM with low super-fat and long cure time, then make that, and enjoy that.
If it's Zany's No-Slime Castile, then make that, and enjoy that.
BTW, toothpaste is a wash-off product, too - yet many of us experience vastly different results with different formulas.