donniej said:
"Neat" is often used to describe something as "straight" or not dilluted.
For example, "neat whiskey" would describe ordering a glass with only whiskey in it (no ice, etc...).
see thats the idea I got as well, so the reasoning I would get behind this would be uncut soap without other ingredients to take down the concentration of soap per surface area (say one cubic cm just for giggles)
so lets say we have one cubic cm of soap made in each method:
Hot Process"
Adding heat with a burner means more water can be "cooked" out of the soap batter via evaporation and thus leave more soap per cubic cm and less h20 per cubic cm, increasing the concentration of soap in cubic cm (and the whole of the raw soap batter)
Cold Process:
Relying on the heat generated by the
exothermic reaction of saponification, some water may evaporate but not all of it (which is why these soaps are cured for extended periods... to my knowledge longer than HP???? I have less experience with HP than CP)
so at the time the soap is raw, there is more h20 in that cubic cm along with soap molecules than in thoroughly cooked HP
gelling vs nongelling I think is a matter of opinion, it cools the max temp of the sap reaction down so alot of the larger molecules (and unsaponifiables) are not denatured , leaving even more h20 in the soap because not as much is evaporated off and thus leaving an even higher concentration of water in that cubic cm.
Now in all of these methods you would still have glycerol which is a biproduct of the saponification reaction, to get truly "neat" soap I assume youd need to remove this as well...
Then I guess you could call the soap neat....
now why youd want to do that is beyond me, maybe put like a 1% superfat and use the end product to clean hardcore nasty kitchen grease up with rubber gloves on....
hows that sound?? lol just my theory