Don't confuse the name "conditioning" with the actual performance of the soap bar. All the "conditioning" number means is the total percentage of oleic, linoleic, linolenic, and ricinoleic fatty acids. They had to give it a name, and "conditioning" stuck, but the name is rather misleading to newer soapers.
Castor oil SOAP isn't the same as castor OIL, as others are pointing out. Many newer soapers want castor to be the miracle cure for lots of bubbles and lots of "conditioning" in their soaps, but a high % of castor in a soap recipe doesn't necessarily work all that well. Far better to let the main players -- myristic, lauric, palmitic, stearic, and oleic acids -- be the stars in a soap recipe. Let ricinoleic acid (the fatty acid from castor oil) be a supporting actor.
The recipe you shared -- thank you! -- could be tweaked to make it more balanced. Your use of stearic acid is a step in the right direction, but I'd use a fat high in stearic acid rather than stearic itself. Add palm, tallow or lard to your recipe in place of the stearic and most or all of the castor. You'll get a nice bar of soap without the trouble that stearic acid brings to your soaping. Your soap will also benefit from the other fatty acids that these fats add to a recipe.
If you like that much coconut oil in your soap, then keep it, but if your skin feels overly dry or tight when using this soap, then consider lowering the coconut oil too.