Why would someone use this in their marketing? What would be the benefit in soap? I looked on the web a little , but I don’t get it. Maybe I’m missing something
Technically, my April challenge soap contained silica too, in the form of diatomaceous earth (which was the farthest I dared to stretch my self-imposed “no colourants” rule). Unless of course I'm just making this up, it indeed adds an ever so slightly scratchy feel (“grip”) to the soap, that is actually pleasant (like a peeling) in conjunction with a little pressure.
But then, if I'd add this to a soap for sale, I'd call it diatomaceous earth rather than silica, just like activated charcoal isn't just called carbon (though chemically correct). Silica is in fact a too generic name to trigger any specific qualities – it could be anything from silicosis-causing dust, over plankton skeletons, glass shards, sand, rocks or moonlight-harvested amethyst.
Hmm, now I am curious about which soap it is. Curious minds want to knowI guess my confusion is with a particular soap I saw. It touted its silica content in its marketing, yet I saw nothing in its ingredients that would indicate said claim. As a consumer, I would have no idea what advantage silica would have to a soap. Just striked me as odd, I guess.
Rocks of Møønlight?
Enter your email address to join: