I'm actually not a total newbie soaper, so I understand about/have tried rebatching/handmilling/soapcalc/indiscriminate use of oils by lye, etc. I've been making my own soap for probably two years now.
IrishLass's comment helped me understand a bit better what the heck "conditioning" really refers to in a soap.
Shocking as it sounds, I don't actually WANT to play around a lot. I know the soap-obsessed won't understand that, but I want soap that is useful and economical. I don't want to sell, I don't want to spend a ton of time or money. I want to understand what the nebulous terms are supposed to mean, since everyone refers to them as if they understand, and yet I'm not totally sure they are as useful as I had hoped.
I have made a few different recipes, using soapcalc to decide how far from the tried and true recipe I want to go, but knowing what the terms are supposed to reference (ethereal terms aren't very useful...) means I can avoid (to some degree) spending money making bars I really don't enjoy using. I make soap simply to stock my home, so it's not as artistic as many of the soapers here. I"m not into fragranced products, and I'm totally happy with a naturally coloured bar for the most part.
(I know at this point there's quite a few people with their eyes bugged out in horror (WHAT! NOT play around with soap recipes and fancy oils and pigments??? Clearly this woman is unwell...))
Having listened to people saying over and over that coconut soap is so drying and being horrified at 100% CO soap, (or even lower percentages) etc, etc, it wasn't until someone (eta... IrishLass again
) recently pointed out that it is only drying to those who find it drying that I began to think about the relativity of all of this, and to try to understand PAST the things people say over and over. (For instance, I dislike using lotion...my preferred skin "feel" is clearly not that of people who use body lotion etc routinely, as well as conditioning soaps. Not that I like feeling dried out and itchy, either....but 100% CO soap doesn't do that to me) That's what this thread's initial question was about....what determines SF levels, and what IS the difference between a high SF and a different oil? I understand that better now.
I guess the next thing is to go from Bex1982's comment and consider how SF affects hardness (since different oils ALSO have an individual hardness number...). Obviously at some point, SF becomes self-defeating if one wants to make useful soap vs soapy oil, and apparently a fairly high oil discount is possible to do and still have nice soap, and hardness is nice but I always think of James Herriot's writing about the latherless piece of soap he was given at a farm, and his wondering about how many generations it had been handed down - there's a breaking point there too...
I was curious about the variables, individually, and as a relative thing to other "options" (SF vs more "conditioning" oil vs less "cleansing" oil), and how these terms are used in order to reflect....something. I don't want to 'try all the soaps' to understand.
Thanks for all comments.